Ultimate Solution Hub

Alternate Timeline Where The Western Roman Empire Survived In

alternate timeline where The Western roman empire Survives Instead Of
alternate timeline where The Western roman empire Survives Instead Of

Alternate Timeline Where The Western Roman Empire Survives Instead Of Map 9 (750 ad) •700 the emperor of africa dies, crowning his adopted son as the heir. •701 the african empire stopped shipping grain and other foods to western roman empire, in hopes of further destabilizing the empire and making valentinian iv an unpopular ruler, planning for a future invasion. While attila mostly raided roman provinces, his brother attacked the visigothic kingdom in illyricum, defeating their king in battle and killing him. •438 western roman empire attacked visigoths and reclaimed their lost territories in the province of illyricum. •442 second migration of germanic tribes over the rhine river caused by the hunnic invasion forced the western roman empire to.

alternate timeline where The Western roman empire Survives Part 3 4
alternate timeline where The Western roman empire Survives Part 3 4

Alternate Timeline Where The Western Roman Empire Survives Part 3 4 Christians of the time believed that the roman empire would be the last empire before the return of christ, therefore any empire that existed must be the roman empire. also the ‘holy’ part of the title is tied up with the investiture controversy and originated in the hre as an effort by barbarossa to claim dominum mundi (rightful universal rule) over the pope. The battle of the frigidus, which happened in september 394 ad, pitted the forces of eastern roman empire, led by emperor theodosius i, against those of its western half, led by emperor eugenius and magister militum arbogast, who was the power behind the throne. iotl theodosius won the battle vinization. If at least the south was more romanised, could a roman empire successor state similar to byzantium thrive, remaining isolated from european politics? i'm trying to write a timeline where this is the case, and rome survives in some form until at least the mid 6th century (because realistically, they still have all the odds stacked against them). Actually what happens with the empire and mohammad in either a) a timeline with no christianity at all or b) a timeline where christianity remains a minority religion, with no state support or interference except for maybe some small states like armenia would both be interesting, but really the comment was throwaway.

Comments are closed.