Behind the scenes in academic publishing: a closer look at peer review. by yara abdou, md. peer review is not a task—it’s a privilege. it is a privilege to be able to contribute to the advancement of scientific research and to help maintain the credibility and integrity of research output. peer review is not only essential for validating. A behind the scenes look at peer review: insights from editors and reviewers. a behind the scenes look at peer review: insights from editors and reviewers. april 18, 2024. anthony r. artino jr., phd associate dean for educational research george washington university school of medicine and health sciences heeyoung han, phd associate professor.
Key takeaways and helpful resources from the scholarly publishing webinar series, co sponsored by academic medicine and mededportal a behind the scenes look at peer review: insights from editors and reviewers a presentation by anthony r. artino jr., phd, laura weingartner, phd, heeyoung han, phd, and michael cameron on april p8, q o q4. Peer review is central to academic publishing. yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious practice, which can cause distress for both reviewers, and those whose work is reviewed. this paper, produced by the editors’ collective, examines the past and future of peer review in academic publishing. the first sections consider how peer review. From "behind the scenes in academic publishing: a closer look at peer review" guest commentary by yara abdou in july 2020 for the asco connection blog (american society for clinical oncology) some prompts to answer during your second or third pass (adapted primarily from the sense about science guide "peer review: the nuts and bolts"):. In their review, walker and rocha da silva (2015) highlight sea changes in peer review linked to the internet and open access publishing. peer review may become more non selective, as practiced in open access publications. with the emergence of formal post publication review, reader commentaries may provide additional peer review channels.
From "behind the scenes in academic publishing: a closer look at peer review" guest commentary by yara abdou in july 2020 for the asco connection blog (american society for clinical oncology) some prompts to answer during your second or third pass (adapted primarily from the sense about science guide "peer review: the nuts and bolts"):. In their review, walker and rocha da silva (2015) highlight sea changes in peer review linked to the internet and open access publishing. peer review may become more non selective, as practiced in open access publications. with the emergence of formal post publication review, reader commentaries may provide additional peer review channels. In traditional peer review, two or more reviewers are asked to evaluate a manuscript on the basis of the expectation that if the two reviewers agree on the quality of the submission, the likelihood of a high quality review is increased. unfortunately, studies have not consistently confirmed a high degree of agreement among reviewers. This model helps to reduce bias in peer review and makes sure that manuscripts are assessed fairly. it is your responsibility to anonymise your manuscript, but. the peer reviewers’ reports, authors’ responses and editors’ decision letters are published alongside the accepted article. you can choose this option at any stage before acceptance.
In traditional peer review, two or more reviewers are asked to evaluate a manuscript on the basis of the expectation that if the two reviewers agree on the quality of the submission, the likelihood of a high quality review is increased. unfortunately, studies have not consistently confirmed a high degree of agreement among reviewers. This model helps to reduce bias in peer review and makes sure that manuscripts are assessed fairly. it is your responsibility to anonymise your manuscript, but. the peer reviewers’ reports, authors’ responses and editors’ decision letters are published alongside the accepted article. you can choose this option at any stage before acceptance.
Comments are closed.