Q&a: why can’t humans fly? the great white pelican has one of the widest wingspans known to scientists, measuring 3.6 meters across. this wingspan is strong enough to support the lesser weight of the bird. if humans were to fly, they would require wings so large that the weight of the wings themselves would prevent flight. courtesy of about . The good. although there would be increased potential for air pollution if humans took flight, it would also decrease the need for on land transportation. cars emit around 6,613 pounds of carbon dioxide per year, and with humans flying from place to place, there would be less cars on the road (via the what if show ).
In order for a human to fly without actually being in an airplane, hot air balloon, rocket, jetpack, or any other flying vehicle (real or imaginary) that person must be able to provide an upward thrust sufficient to counter his weight. unfortunately, we have no way to provide this force without some outside assistance. posted on january 27. The birth of the airplane. it would take until the early 1800s for sir george cayley to discover a way to use. aerodynamics to help humans fly. cayley is the first person known to identify the four forces which act on heavier than air flying vehicles: weight, lift, drag and thrust. To really fly — as opposed to falling and gliding — an object must have thrust equal to or exceeding drag. a human can generate about 0.5 horsepower in short bursts and about 0.3 horsepower over a longer period. that’s not much. consequently, a human powered craft will always be slow. As airspeed and propeller speed decreases towards the human powered regime, propeller size must grow exorbitantly if it is to deliver comparable thrust. at the lower speeds, you need to accelerate.
Comments are closed.