Comparing The 787 777 200 300er And The 777 8 9x List price. boeing's list price for the 787 starts at $248.3mn for the smallest variant and rises to $338.4 for the 10. this is a savings over the ultra popular 777 300er, which cost airlines $375.5mn during its run compared to just $292.5mn for the 787 9. while this $83mn might be worth it for some airlines looking to fill premium demand, it. Keesje, it is safe to say that the 777 8 9x will be launched in june and we can probably guess that the 787 10 will be launched if not in conjunction with the 777 8 9x, but later on this year. that article is 8 years old, what matters is now, not then. just saying. to date, the a350 family have sold 617, not 650.
Notгќcias E Histг Rias Sobre Aviaг гѓo Boeing 777 X 787 Como Os Twinjets The boeing 777 vs 787 are titans of the sky, each designed with distinct missions in mind. the 777, known for its impressive size, offers greater capacity and power, accommodating up to 396 passengers and boasting a range of up to 8,555 nm in its 777 200lr variant. in contrast, the 787 dreamliner shines in efficiency and technology, capable of. The 787 performs significantly better in comparison, with its fuel consumption falling between 4,900 and 5,600 liters an hour. for long haul flights: the boeing 777 300er consumes fuel at 2.9 liters per 100 kilometers per seat. the 787 10 achieves even better efficiency, using only 2.27 liters per 100 kilometers per seat. The cheapest b787 dreamliner model costs nearly $200 million more than the smallest third generation b777. it can be argued that the mid size b787 9’s price of $292.5 million is a more accurate comparison to the b777 8, in which case the price difference shrinks to $118 million. the biggest model of the boeing 787 dreamliner is the b787 10. On long haul flights, the boeing 777 300er demonstrates a fuel consumption rate of 2.9 l 100 km per seat. in comparison, the boeing 787 10 achieves a more efficient performance, consuming 2.27 l 100 km of fuel. this means that the boeing 787 10 saves 0.63 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers flown per seat, when compared to the boeing 777 300er.
Comments are closed.