Does A 25 00 Sony Receiver Sound Better Than A Cl I found a cheap and cheerful, modern sony receiver, and decided to pit it head to head against my vintage marantz 2270. also, i get nostalgic for an old tech. Mr. v fet. may 14, 2008. #12. the biggest advantage of classic sony receivers is that they are still available at reasonable prices (even the totl units), a thing which is not the case with totl marantz, sansui and pioneer (compare e.g. the sx 1250 and the str v7 ) > you can't do anything wrong with one of the receivers which whitehall.
Flagship Marantz Surround Receiver Vs Vintage Marantz Integrated Youtube The new es series come with big, heavy power supplies (even the az3000es weighs nearly 42lbs, where as the cinema 40 weighs only 33lbs). if you have to use an avr for your 2 channel music ('pure direct' from stereo analog input sources), then sony es and marantz are the only two brands i've owned that were sufficiently good enough sounding. That said, testing the marantz cinema 30 has reminded me that the better than a soundbar sony ht a9 can’t really hold a candle to an avr speakers setup. of course, that shouldn’t really come as a surprise: we’re talking about a huge box with multiple, high quality amplifiers feeding hi fi quality speakers via high end speaker cables. The nr1403 is a 5 channel, 50w receiver. the denon line is allowed to compromise greatly. take the denon avr 1913 at $349 and is a 7 channel 90w reciever. marantz has nothing to compete at that price point relatively speaking. the denon is a touch brighter than anything in marantz's line. Verdict. the marantz sr8015 is pretty much as good as you can get in a home cinema multichannel amplifier, unless you’re prepared to leap to the units that cost 10s of thousands of dollars. in short, it’s brilliant. best home theatre speaker systems 2021. sound image.
Comments are closed.