How To End Big Tech Censorship Of Free Speech
![how To End Big Tech Censorship Of Free Speech how To End Big Tech Censorship Of Free Speech](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/07/twitter-censorship.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=1024)
How To End Big Tech Censorship Of Free Speech Our proposal ensures big tech is no longer protected if it censors individuals or media outlets or removes factually correct content simply because it doesn’t fit its woke narrative. 3. the post. Conservatives are being censored. claiming that “right wing voices are being censored,” republican led legislatures in florida and texas have introduced legislation to “end big tech censorship.”. they say that the dominant tech platforms block legitimate speech without ever articulating their moderation policies, that they are slow to.
![big tech censorship Defend free speech Act For America big tech censorship Defend free speech Act For America](https://www.actforamerica.org/sites/default/files/Untitled-`.png)
Big Tech Censorship Defend Free Speech Act For America The disincentivizing internet service censorship of online users and restrictions on speech and expression (discourse) act wo uld hold big tech responsible for complying with pre existing obligations per section 230 of the communications decency act (cda) of 1996 and clarify ambiguous terms that allow big tech to engage in censorship. On monday, justice clarence thomas announced that the supreme court soon will have to put an end to big tech tyranny. amen. if the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in. Us solicitor general elizabeth prelogar, speaking in support of the tech lobby's case, urged the court to rule narrowly on what she called a "defect" in the texas law, rather than issuing broad. Scott thinks there is. “enact tort laws that render tech companies liable for any damages that arise as a result of their censorship of any information, and establish that damages will be presumed in any instance in which censored information later turns out to be true,” scott recommends. “at the same time, expressly retain an exclusion.
Comments are closed.