The Great Philosophers Was Stoic Marcus Aurelius Really A Philosopher Plato 's concept of the philosopher king (one who governs according to philosophical precepts and higher truths) is thought to be best exemplified through the roman emperor marcus aurelius antoninus (r. 161 180 ce), the last of the five good emperors of rome and a devout student of stoicism, whose principles informed both his life and reign. Marcus aurelius antoninus ( latin: [ˈmaːrkʊs au̯ˈreːliʊs antoːˈniːnʊs]; english: ɔːˈriːliəs or ee lee əs; [ 2] 26 april 121 – 17 march 180) was roman emperor from 161 to 180 and a stoic philosopher. he was a member of the nerva–antonine dynasty, the last of the rulers later known as the five good emperors and the last.
Marcus Aurelius Philosopher Emperor Or Philosopher King Brewminate Marcus aurelius (born april 26, 121 ce, rome [italy]—died march 17, 180, vindobona [vienna, austria] or sirmium, pannonia) was a roman emperor (161–180), best known for his meditations on stoic philosophy. marcus aurelius has symbolized for many generations in the west the golden age of the roman empire. It is very common to hear in both academic circles, as well as more close knit stoic circles, marcus aurelius (121 – 180 ce) being referred to as the philosopher king. this is not an idea that is heavily under contention. marcus aurelius was definitely an amazing individual. he was adopted first by the emperor hadrian (76 – 138 ce) and then. 1. life and works. born in 121 ce and educated extensively in rhetoric and philosophy, marcus aurelius succeeded his adoptive father antoninus pius as emperor of rome in 161 ce and reigned until his own death in 180. his reign was troubled by attacks from germany, rebellions in northern italy and egypt, and an outburst of the plague; at least. The death of marcus aurelius marked a significant turning point in roman history. he was the last of the "five good emperors," and his passing ushered in a period of instability that eventually led to the decline of the roman empire. his son, commodus, who succeeded him, is often cited as one of the less capable emperors.
Comments are closed.