The Trace Makes No Sense Harry Potter Film Theory
![the Trace Makes No Sense Harry Potter Film Theory Youtube the Trace Makes No Sense Harry Potter Film Theory Youtube](https://ytimg.googleusercontent.com/vi/9SfLFrtk5UI/maxresdefault.jpg)
The Trace Makes No Sense Harry Potter Film Theory Youtube Go to betterhelp super to get 10% off your first month of betterhelp.go to meundies theories for 20% off your first order and free ship. So this is the first reason why it makes no sense because according to all of the books, the trace is on harry not his place of residence. the second example that makes no sense is during and after harry leaves the privet drive. harry isn’t supposed to disapparate or use the floo network to leave because the ministry will “know” about it.
![harry potter 15 Plot Holes That make no sense Even If You Ve Read The harry potter 15 Plot Holes That make no sense Even If You Ve Read The](https://static1.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/harry-b.jpg)
Harry Potter 15 Plot Holes That Make No Sense Even If You Ve Read The Ahh, the trace, one of many brand new, oft contradicted yet suddenly most important bits of magic in the world that deathly hallows gives us! seriously, you are very much correct, if the trace existed then things like teenage voldemort being able to kill his father and grandparents while framing his uncle make no sense whatsoever. So, in the harry potter universe, the trace is a charm cast upon all young witches and wizards to alert the ministry of magic whenever they cast magic, so that they can stop underage use of magic. it's important to note that the trace doesn't actually detect when a specific wizard casts magic, but rather it detects when magic is used around. @po ta toe sure, but an in universe answer would be of some interest and i have to agree that this is a very crude kind of red herring as the film gives absolutely no other good reason for karkaroff to have done that at all, which makes it seem, after the fact, like an obvious attempt to mislead the viewer, rather than something that actually happened in the story's world. Fan theories cropped up that snape was never supposed to be romanticized, but rather humanized. and in a lengthy twitter thread, rowling revealed that this was the case. he was a cruel man who bullied children but she claims he also gave his life to save the world. neither a hero nor a villain.
Comments are closed.