Summary. the airbus a380 beats the boeing 747 in passenger capacity, with the ability to accommodate 250 more passengers in a full economy configuration. the a380 offers more interior space, allowing for the inclusion of bars, showers, lounges, and private suites, making it a popular choice for luxurious first class offerings. For example, and as a ballpark figure that varies vividly based on several factors, the airbus a380 burns an estimated average of 11,400 liters or around 9,152 kilograms of jet fuel per hour, which is slightly more than the boeing 747 and expected because of its bigger size and payload capacity. however, compared to new generational aircraft.
2.2 boeing 747: striking a balance. while the b747 is a heavyweight itself, it manages to strike a better balance in fuel efficiency compared to the a380. its newer iterations, such as the b747 8, incorporate fuel saving enhancements, making it more economically viable for airlines. a380 of lufthansa. Two class 615 long range. no matter how airlines configure their cabins, the airbus a380 pushes the 747 right out of the gate with passenger capacity. in a full economy configuration, the a380 can handle 250 more passengers than the 747. nonetheless, this is because it was designed nearly 35 40 years after the boeing 747 first took flight. The boeing 747 enjoys a slight edge with a cruising speed of mach 0.85, whereas the airbus a380 cruises at mach 0.85, albeit at a different altitude due to its size. range is a key attribute for an aircraft. on this point, the boeing 747 impresses with its remarkable range of approximately 7,500 nautical miles (around 13,890 kilometers). The boeing 747 and airbus a380 are used for long haul flights. the boeing 747 was initially designed as a long haul aircraft and is still primarily used for flights across oceans or to other continents. the airbus a380 was also designed for long haul flights, and it is often used on routes between major global cities that see a lot of air traffic.
Comments are closed.